![]() ![]() ![]() In fact, one current review chases PhotoLab for the out of date colour tools. ![]() Right now if I or anyone else goes out to promote PhotoLab on DPreview for instance, anyone can answer: “Yes it’s great but it’s really slow on A7R III images” or “The noise reduction is superb but the colour tools are really weak in comparison to C1” or “Sadly, it’s slow on Mac, C1 flies”. It’s those photographers DxO needs to reach. There is a huge minority of photographers (more than enough to support PhotoLab) for whom the results – in an efficient and pleasant workflow – are the most important criteria for choosing RAW software. If PhotoLab yields the best images, maintains its very smooth workflow and becomes competitively fast DxO will flourish. If the core project does not get enough love (fortunately DxO is catching up with cameras and lenses), the core project will fall behind. Every extra project which DxO adds which does not substantially increase revenue compromises their ability to maintain the core project. They can hire a new building of people if they feel like it and not even feel the costs. The only barrier to Adobe adding an app or features is if they feel like it or not, there’s no financial barrier. The only iPad which could potentially run PhotoLab fluidly would be a top of the line iPad Pro. The latest iPad pro is extremely powerful and I think it has more than enough power for Photolab. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |